Discussion Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 9

Discussion - Essay Example The arguments against using these measures to fight unionization are that the organization can take a role which has more empathy and understanding more than anything else. The actions are indeed extreme as they deal with the jobs and relations of the employees on the job. I believe most managers would find a way to deal with their employees in a more honest way and come out in a clean manner. They would not find an excuse to do away with the aspect of unionization that has been a source of bane at the organization. Most managers would discuss these aspects with their employees and find a common ground so that they do not lose out on a number of different organizational counts. In essence, I would do the same things and make myself clear before deciding what course of action to adopt in the long run. I am of the view that being truthful about one’s dealings in the organization is essential. Managers have a duty to avoid unionization especially if the organization does not believe in such a philosophy but it is always good to come out cleanly for the betterment of the business and the relationships that develop between the managers and their subordinates. Employees join unions because they believe unions would raise their voice as a whole and in a collective fashion. Therefore I would agree with the truth of the statement more than disagreeing with it. However I believe that the element of unionization has been blown out of contexts in the recent years and unions are not as strong (negatively) as these used to be in the yesteryears. Now unions are all about bringing in collective good, not only for the sake of the organization but also for their own selves (Edwards 2003). I agree with this statement because it offers the employees a sense of security with regards to the basis of their jobs, and tells them in what stead their

Why did the suffragette movement in London turn violent in 1908 Essay

Why did the suffragette movement in London turn violent in 1908 - Essay Example The Daily Mail in London, on 10th January 1906, used the word â€Å"suffragette† to identify those women who adopted the method of action and violence in their campaign for their right to vote. â€Å"Suffragists† was used for those women who adopted peaceful and conventional methods in their campaign. Although the women had been fighting for their right to vote ever since the 1860s, the movement gained its momentum under the leadership of Emmeline Pankhurst and her two daughters Christabel and Sylvia. The Pankhursts’ established the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU) in 1903. According to June Purvis (2003), Emmeline was moved by the plight of women in poverty. She believed that the only way the women could gain their rights in the society was through the right to vote. As June Purvis (2003) writes, Emmeline believed that â€Å"women.. had to form their own independent movement if the vote was to be won and to find new ways of breathing life into the women’s suffrage campaign.† Pankhurst disagreed with the ways of the NUWSS led by Millicent Garrett Fawcett. NUWSS had adopted peaceful and â€Å"ladylike† conventional methods of campaigning and also recruited men for various positions. According to Purvis (2003), â€Å"Emmeline was convince d that a fresh approach was needed and that women had to do the work themselves.† This led to the formation of the WSPU. It was made clear that the WSPU would be different from the NUWSS. They pledged to limit the membership to women only and to be satisfied with nothing but action. As Purvis (2003) writes, â€Å"Deeds, not words† was adopted as the main motto of the WSPU.